Strain Gauge vs. Other Sensing Technologies: What’s Best for Custom Force Sensors?

A strange fact to start. Most force sensor failures do not come from bad hardware. They come from the wrong sensing choice made at the start.

It happens quietly. Data looks fine in the lab buy the real loads hit. Temperature shifts, noise creeps in, accuracy slips and suddenly the sensor is the weak link.

This piece of writing clears that fog. You will learn how strain gauges compare to other sensing technologies, where each one shines, and how to choose the best option for custom force sensors without overthinking it.

Why force-sensing decisions matter more now

Force sensors are everywhere now: Robotics, medical tools, automation lines and aerospace rigs, even consumer devices.

Industry data shows the global force sensor market keeps growing as systems get smaller and smarter. At the same time, tolerance for error keeps shrinking.

A tiny drift today can cause big failures tomorrow. That puts pressure on one key decision.

Strain gauges explained without the jargon

A strain gauge measures how much a material stretches or compresses when force is applied. That stretch changes electrical resistance. The change is measured, and the force is calculated. Simple idea, but extremely reliable when done right.

Strain gauges have been around for decades because they work: Quietly, predictably, over long periods of time.

Why strain gauges still lead custom force sensor design

Accuracy you can trust

Strain gauge sensors offer high accuracy across a wide force range. More importantly, they stay accurate. When calibrated well, they deliver repeatable results for years, not weeks.

Built for custom geometry

Custom force sensors rarely look standard. Strain gauges can be bonded to beams, rings, plates, or complex shapes. That flexibility makes them ideal when space, load direction, or mounting is unusual. You design the sensor around the application, not the other way around.

Strong performance in harsh conditions

With the right protection, strain gauges handle:

Temperature swings
Long duty cycles
Vibration
Industrial environments

That is why they dominate test rigs, aerospace systems, and heavy equipment.

Other force-sensing technologies and where they fit

Strain gauges are not always the answer. Other technologies shine in specific cases.

Piezoelectric sensors

Piezo sensors generate a charge when force changes. They are excellent for fast events like impacts or vibration analysis. But they struggle with steady force. If the load stays constant, the signal fades. That limits their use for static measurements.

Capacitive force sensors

Capacitive sensors measure changes in the distance between plates. They are sensitive and work well at low forces. They react to temperature, humidity, and electrical noise. In controlled environments, they perform well.

Hydraulic and pneumatic load sensing

These systems handle very high loads. They are common in heavy machinery. For compact custom force sensors, they are rarely practical.

Optical force sensors

Optical sensors use light to detect force changes. They resist electrical noise, which is useful in special environments. They are also complex, expensive, and harder to integrate into custom mechanical designs.

When strain gauges are the better choice

This is where the title really comes into play.

For bespoke force sensors, strain gauges are a good bet in the following situations:

steady readings over time
There is little to no movement in the force
The form factor of the sensor has to be tailor-made
Unpredictable or industrialized environments
Dependability over innovation in the long run is paramount

They are more practical than other options, despite their lack of sparkle. That matters when products leave the lab.

Customized 6-Axis Force Sensor Buy Online

Real-world example from production

One automation system used capacitive sensors during early testing. Performance looked great in controlled trials. Once installed on the factory floor, readings drifted as temperatures changed, and calibration became a weekly task.

The team redesigned the sensor using strain gauges. Drift dropped, calibration held, downtime stopped. That story repeats across industries.

2026 trend: smarter strain gauge systems

Strain gauges are not stuck in the past.

In 2026, most advanced designs combine strain gauges with:

Digital compensation
Temperature correction
Smart signal processing

The sensing element stays simple. On top is the intelligence. This combined method provides precision without compromising dependability.

Final thoughts

When comparing strain gauges to other sensing technologies, the answer depends on reality, not theory. For custom force sensors, strain gauges continue to offer the best balance of accuracy, flexibility, and long-term stability.

Other technologies have their place. But few perform as consistently once conditions get messy.

If you are developing a custom force sensor and want guidance based on real engineering experience, Marex can help you choose the right sensing path from the start.

What matters most in your application right now? Sensitivity at the edge, or performance you never have to question?

Common Challenges in Multi-Axis Force Measurement – And How to Solve Them

A robotic arm in a clean room applies too much force, cracking a solar wafer. A collaborative robot in assembly feels sluggish, its reactions just slightly off. The source isn’t the code. It’s the force sensor. The system’s sense of touch is flawed. These aren’t malfunctions. They are mismatches. The silent language of force feedback is speaking gibberish, and the machine obeys.

The Core Challenge: It’s Not a Sensor, It’s a Compromise

You buy a multi-axis force sensor for a reason: precision. Yet, you face a trio of relentless problems that undermine that goal. They are technical, yes, but their impact is purely practical: wasted time, scrap, and underperformance.

Crosstalk: The Data You Didn’t Ask For

Apply pure downward force. The Z-axis reads correctly. But the Y-axis also shows a slight signal. That’s crosstalk. Force from one direction leaks into another. Your controller receives a lie. It tries to compensate, introducing new errors. The result? A machine that fumbles its task. A grinding tool that wobbles. A prosthetic grip that feels unnatural. Standard sensors tolerate a crosstalk spec of 2-5%. In micron-level work, that’s a canyon of error.

Environmental Sabotage

Your factory floor is the enemy. Vibration from conveyors. Temperature swings from welding. Electromagnetic noise from drives. These aren’t nuisances. They are signal assassins. A sensor calibrated in a lab can drift wildly when bolted next to a stamping press. The data becomes noisy, unstable, and useless. You don’t need a sensor. You need a sensor built for your specific warzone.

The Physical Integration Headache

Found the perfect sensor. Right capacity. Perfect accuracy. Now install it. The bolt pattern doesn’t match. The connector faces the wrong way. The output is an analog voltage, but your system only reads digital EtherCAT. The project halts. You’re now redesigning mounting brackets, adding signal converters, and creating new failure points. The “solution” creates three new problems.

Solving It: The Custom-Fit Philosophy

Fixing this requires a different mindset. Stop shopping for a component. Start engineering a measurement node. The solution is specificity.

Buy 3 axis Force Sensor Online

Designing Out Crosstalk at the Source

Fighting crosstalk with software filters is a band-aid. The fix is physical and fundamental. It requires a sensing element designed with decoupling as the first principle. Think of it as architectural isolation for strain gauges. Advanced designs use unique grid patterns and monolithic structures to ensure force directed on the X-axis stays reported on the X-axis. The goal is a crosstalk specification under 1%. Clarity by design, not correction.

Engineering for the Environment, Not Against It

You combat environmental noise by building a fortress, not a fence. This means:

Material Science: Selecting alloy cores with near-zero thermal expansion for the sensing element itself.
Absolute Sealing: Hermetic welds that protect the internal electronics from humidity, coolant, and dust permanently.
Active Shielding: Built-in filtering that targets the specific EMI frequencies of industrial motors.

The sensor must be born from your environment’s harsh reality.

Integration as the Starting Point

This is where true customization changes everything. The mechanical and electrical interface should not be an afterthought. It is the primary design constraint. A partner who gets this will offer what catalog suppliers cannot:

A custom flange that bolts directly to your robot’s wrist interface.
A low-profile housing machined to fit inside a surgical tool’s existing cavity.
A native Ethernet/IP or PROFINET output from the sensor’s own processor.
The machine’s design dictates the sensor’s form. Not the other way around.

From Problem to Precision: Making the Shift

The outcome of this approach is transformative. It moves force measurement from being a variable to being a constant. A foundation. When the data is inherently clean and the fit is physically seamless, the machine’s intelligence can finally act with confidence. That robotic arm doesn’t just avoid breaking the wafer. It can feel the wafer’s presence, its alignment, and handle it with nuanced, adaptive pressure.

This shift starts with a different kind of specification document. Don’t just list the sensor specs you think you need. Document the real-world problem.

Describe the exact forces, both expected and potential overload.
Map the environmental attackers: temperature range, vibration sources, and wash-down procedures.
Define the mechanical and electrical space: share the 3D model of the assembly, and list the communication protocols your controller understands.

That document isn’t a purchase order. It’s an invitation to solve the problem correctly.

Where does your current system’s “sense of touch” fall short? Identifying that precise gap is the first step toward building a solution that doesn’t just measure, but truly understands.

MareX engineers begin with that question. The blueprint follows.